A Visual of the LNG Proposal


Before LNG - 2004:

 

 

 

 

 

To down a bigger image file, click here or proceed to the following link:

http://www.sipayik.com/images/PassamaquoddyBay20041.bmp

 

LNG in Full Operation - 2008?:

 

 

 

 

The LNG picture is from a terminal located in MA.
To down a bigger image file, click here or proceed to the following link:

http://www.sipayik.com/images/PassamaquoddyBay20081.bmp


Here is the insight and communication received from the individual who provided the photos:


Attached are two photos...one I call Passamaquoddy Bay 2004, and the other Passamaquoddy Bay 2008...enjoy! The Quoddy Tides published the panorama of the Everett plant, as I sent the photo to them last month.  Both shots were stitched together, with no 'doctoring'...all dimensions are true.

One more thought...two tanks and a dock wouldn't cost $300 million nor would it take 4 years to build...someone isn't telling the whole story, and you might be suspicious!

I also don't trust anyone involved due to the immense investment ($300mil) which is played up, versus the ridiculous range, $2-20 million realized by the tribe. No other business would be so vague. An investment by any other industry (not energy) of $300 million would produce far more jobs than 50-70. No other industry, not even retailers like WalMart, are so vague. I think the truth is too scary for the Gas Industry too tell. The engineering company I work for employs the same number of people yet cost about 13 million to develop.
 
I am an engineer and would be canned in a heartbeat if I produced such irrational, inconsistent numbers. If my boss asked me what could we expect as a return on a design and I gave a 10-to-one range, I would be laughed out of his office. The two tanks might be for the storage of the gas, (these tanks are huge) but a heck of a lot more hardware is needed for processing. The gas has to be allowed to re-expand, and this is done under fairly complex conditions.
 
If I was in the tribe, I would be asking myself and others this: why, if this terminal is so benign, does no one want it near them? Massachusetts is already a mess, yet no one wants another one, pre-911. Long before 911, no one here said "oh sure, that sounds great". Terrorism is a notion only recently brought into the fold, and it is being used as excuses for doing or not doing all kinds of crazy things. We don't want one here in my area due to the obvious reasons...they are dangerous even on a good day, in clear weather. They are environmentally disruptive. They provide little income (other than to the utility company) relative to the investment and sacrifice of the community.
 

I would like to add one more thought, concerning the notion that terrorist threats make Washington County a better alternative:

 
The idea that placing such an installation in a more remote area will make it less of a target of 'Bin Laden' is nonsense.
 
As a Massachusetts resident, I don't value Massachusetts lives any more than those in Eastport or Pleasant Point, Maine. And neither do terrorists. The terrorist threats will follow the opportunities. They want to disrupt supplies, wherever and whatever they are.
 
All this being said, the biggest threat is the affect this will have on the environment in the Passamaquoddy Bay.

 

Please quote my opinion which is in bold.
 
Thanks!

KR